Search this study companion
At a glance
The historical record of Christian institutions includes real violence, oppression, and hypocrisy, leading many to conclude the religion itself is the problem.
The deepest content of the gospel — grace, humility, love of enemy, equal dignity for all people — actually condemns those very abuses, and has repeatedly fueled the reform movements that opposed them.
Relevant Scripture
“He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?”
Micah 6:8 KJV
UECF.NET summary
Keller does not minimize the church's real failures — he names the Crusades, the Inquisition, complicity in colonialism and slavery, and everyday self-righteous hypocrisy as genuine sins requiring repentance, not excuse. His central move is to distinguish nominal or cultural Christianity — using the church's name and power for worldly ends — from the actual content of the gospel, which teaches grace instead of merit, service instead of domination, and love of neighbor and even enemy. Where professing Christians committed atrocities, Keller argues, they were typically betraying core gospel teaching, not simply applying it.
He then points to the internal resources within Christian teaching that fueled reform: Old Testament prophets condemning the oppression of the poor, Jesus's countercultural treatment of women and social outcasts, and Paul's declaration in Galatians that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female — an equality that took centuries to be lived out but supplied the theological seeds for movements like abolition and civil rights, often led by deeply committed Christians such as William Wilberforce. Keller's final point is that abandoning Christian belief does not solve the underlying human problem: secular societies and ideologies in the twentieth century produced their own atrocities on an even larger scale, which suggests the deeper issue is the universal human capacity for self-righteousness and abuse of power, something no worldview, religious or secular, automatically cures.
Main themes
- Real historical sins by the church call for honest acknowledgment and repentance, not denial.
- Abuses done in Christ's name often contradict, rather than express, the actual content of the gospel.
- Biblical teaching supplied theological resources for major reform and justice movements.
- No worldview — religious or secular — is automatically immune to being used to justify oppression.
Key ideas
- Distinguishing nominal Christianity from gospel Christianity clarifies which failures are betrayals of the message versus applications of it.
- Galatians 3:28's vision of equality in Christ pre-dates, and helped inspire, later movements against slavery and discrimination.
- Prophetic critique of injustice (Micah 6:8 and similar texts) is built into the Bible's own moral vision, not opposed to it.
- Secular ideologies committed comparable or greater atrocities in the twentieth century, undermining the idea that religion alone is the problem.
Important concepts
- Nominal Christianity — Cultural or in-name-only religious identity, detached from the actual content and demands of the gospel — the source, Keller argues, of much abuse done "in Christ's name."
- Prophetic critique — The Bible's own internal tradition (the Old Testament prophets, Jesus, the apostles) of condemning injustice and oppression, including by religious leaders.
- Imago Dei — The doctrine that every human being is made in God's image, supplying the theological basis for human equality and dignity across race, class, and sex.
Related Bible references
Practical Christian application
- When you hear of historical or present-day church wrongdoing, practice naming it honestly before defending the faith — lament before apologetics.
- Study one Christian-led reform movement (abolition, civil rights, or another) and note the specific biblical convictions that drove it.
- Examine your own life for any gap between the gospel you profess and how you actually treat people different from you.
Questions for study
Reflection questions
- What historical failure of the church has been hardest for you personally to reconcile with genuine faith?
- Where might nominal, cultural religion be masquerading as real faith in your own life or church?
- How does knowing Christians helped lead major justice movements change (or not change) how you weigh the church's record?
Small-group discussion
- How can a church acknowledge historical and present wrongdoing honestly without either denying it or concluding the gospel itself is false?
- What specific biblical texts have historically fueled movements for justice, and how well does your community know and apply them today?
- Is your group more prone to defensiveness or to despair when confronted with the church's failures? What would a third way look like?
These notes are an original UECF.NET study companion and are not a reproduction of Timothy Keller's text, which remains in copyright. Read “The Church Is Responsible for So Much Injustice” in The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism by Timothy Keller (Dutton, 2008; ISBN 978-0-525-95049-3). A catalog record for one scanned copy is available for reference at the Internet Archive (controlled digital lending — not reproduced here). Scripture quotations above are the King James Version. No quotations from Keller are included on this page. See About this Edition for full source and rights information.
